McIntosh, Kent, Girvan, Erik J., Horner, Robert H., Smolkowski, Keith, and Sugai, George. 2018. “A 5-Point Intervention for Enhancing Equity in School Discipline.” Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) February 2018.
Authored by the nation’s experts in PBIS, this article provides insights into cultural responsiveness as a key component in creating equitable positive behavioral supports.
McIntosh, Kent, Girvan, Erik J., Horner, Robert H., Smolkowski, Keith, and Sugai, George. 2018. “A 5-Point Intervention for Enhancing Equity in School Discipline.” Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) February 2018.
The tool from the National Center for Culturally Responsive Education Systems Training (NNCREST) provides an overview of how RtI can be understood and used with diverse learners. It is useful for practitioners because it offers insight into how RtI can extend beyond a policy prescription in order to truly be responsive to all learners.
Esparza Brown, J., and Doolittle, J. A Cultural, Linguistic, and Ecological Framework for Response to Intervention with English Language Learners. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, 2008.
The authors discuss the need to use UDL and CRT in instruction. They argue that pre service and inservice teachers are culturally situated within cultural and linguistic groups. It is important for pre- and in-service teachers to understand this cross-pollination when using the UDL Guidelines as an implementation tool in their classrooms to proactively identify and address potential barriers to student learning while sustaining their students' cultural and linguistic identities.
Takemae, N., Nicoll-Senft, J., & Tyler, R. M. (2022). Addressing Issues of Equity Using the Cross-Pollination of Universal Design for Learning and Culturally Responsive Teaching. PDS Partners: Bridging Research to Practice, 17(1), 9–15.
Dr. Magdealeno and his colleagues at Center for Leadership Equity and Research (CLEAR) have scripted a new phrase for practitioners, that is, “The Acknowledgment Gap.” The Acknowledgement Gap exists when educational leaders neglect to recognize and intervene even though it is evident that race and ethnicity, social class, and customs and culture all affect school environments. The CLEAR website provides information and resources on the use of Restorative Justice, Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports, Social-Emotional Learning, and Trauma Informed Practices to promote progress toward equitable schools.
Magdealeno, K. Center for Leadership Equity and Research. 2018. CLEAR. http://clearvoz.com/homepage/ (accessed April 17, 2018).
The authors presents a research-based conference strategy designed to cultivate a trusting relationship between families and educators, referred to as Building Equitable Trusting Relationships (BETR). Critical to this three step trust-building process is understanding one's own and the site/district' culture and how that impacts the process.
Lindo, E. J., Kyzar, K. B., & Gershwin, T. (2023). Cultural Considerations for Building Equitable and Trusting Relationships (BETR) With All Families. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00400599231161799
Addresses essential elements of becoming culturally responsive and ways in which teachers can implement strategies in their classrooms.
Technical Assistance Center on Disproportionality, New York University (2008).
The tool created by NYU Metro Center aims to assist parents, teachers, students, and community members in evaluating the cultural responsiveness of their schools' English Language Arts curricula. Through this process, we aim to stimulate reflection on optimal learning approaches, content, and methods to enhance student engagement. Our tool draws upon diverse resources such as multicultural rubrics, anti-bias rubrics, textbook evaluations, and standards for culturally inclusive education. We have enriched these resources with supplementary questions to offer a thorough assessment tool. For complete information on the development of this tool, please refer to the Scorecard Development section at bit.ly/CRCScorecard.
Citation: Bryan-Gooden, J., M. Hester, and L. Q. Peoples. 2023. Culturally Responsive ELA Curriculum Scorecard. New York: Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools, New York University.
The Culturally Responsive-Sustaining Education (CR-SE) self-assessment was designed to support districts to develop and invest in culturally responsive school environments for every child. The CR-SE self-assessment supports the effort to make CR-SE systemic and sustaining by by outlining the beliefs, policies and practices critical to building and fostering culturally responsive and sustaining learning environments.
Swier, Reed, Maria Hernandez, and David Lopez. 2021. Culturally Responsive-Sustaining Education Comprehensive District Self-Assessment. New York: Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools, New York University,
https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/2021-09/CRSE%20District%20Self%20Assesment%20final-Fillable-ToUpload.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023).
Form A: Administrators; Form B: Assessment Only. A self-study tool that assists district teams in examining policies, procedures, and practices in general and special education to prevent disproportionality. It is ideal for school-level self-assessments and well suited for small districts.
Heraldo Richards, Alfredo Artiles, Janette Klingner, and Ayanna Brown (2005) National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems.
Maynard and Weinstein use this text to encourage educators to create school cultures that rely on relationships, empathy, communication and restoration in place of punishment and exclusion.
Maynard, Nathan, and Weinstein, Brad. 2019. Hacking School Discipline: 9 Ways to Create a Culture of Empathy and Responsibility Using Restorative Justice. Highland Heights, OH: Times 10 Publications.
