Address
The Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) (Website)

A national, federally funded center that provides capacity-building information and technical assistance for identifying, adapting, and sustaining effective school-wide disciplinary practices. Includes valuable tools and materials for school use.

Address
A Cultural, Linguistic, and Ecological Framework for Response to Intervention with English Language Learners (PDF)

The tool from the National Center for Culturally Responsive Education Systems Training (NNCREST) provides an overview of how RtI can be understood and used with diverse learners. It is useful for practitioners because it offers insight into how RtI can extend beyond a policy prescription in order to truly be responsive to all learners.

Citation/Source

Esparza Brown, J., and Doolittle, J. A Cultural, Linguistic, and Ecological Framework for Response to Intervention with English Language Learners. Washington, DC:  Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, 2008.

Publication Date
2008
Address
A Scalable Empathic-Mindset Intervention Reduces Group Disparities In School Suspensions (Webpage)


The empathic-mindset intervention is an online exercise to refocus middle school teachers on understanding and valuing the perspectives of students and on  sustaining  positive  relationships even when students misbehave.  This intervention reduced suspension rates especially for Black and Hispanic students, reduced the racial disparity over the school year by 45%.  Significant reductions were also observed students with disabilities and for students with one previous suspension. These reductions persisted through the next year when students interacted with different teachers, suggesting that empathic treatment  with even one teacher in a critical period can improve students’ trajectories through school. 

Citation/Source

Okonofua, Jason, J. Parker Goyer, Constance Lindsay, Johnetta Haugabrook, and Gregory Walton. 2022. “A scalable empathic-mindset intervention reduces group disparities in school suspensions.” Science Advances 8, no. 12, https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/sciadv.abj0691 (accessed January 30, 2023).

Publication Date
2022
Address
Annotated Checklist for Addressing Racial Disproportionality in Special Education

This CDE-approved self-assessment tool provides three checklists that address 1) district and school resource issues; 2) system policy, procedure, and practice issues at district, school, and classroom levels; and 3) environmental factors, all designed to aid in efforts to identify possible root causes of disproportionality and to help districts develop hypotheses and action plans for more detailed explorations of racial disproportionality.

Citation/Source

Losen, D.J., Annotated Checklist for Addressing Racial Disproportionality in Special Education.  Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (2008).

Publication Date
2008
Address
Applying Positive Behavioral Support and Functional Behavioral Assessment in Schools: Technical Assistance Guide (PDF)

The technical assistance guide provides a comprehensive overview of the theory and components of PBIS and functional behavior assessments (FBAs). The guide is useful for practitioners that seek to clarify their understandings about the purpose and use of PBIS and FBAs in practice.

Citation/Source

George Sugai, Robert H. Horner, and others. "Applying Positive Behavioral Support and Functional Behavioral Assessment in Schools: Technical Assistance Guide," 1999.

Publication Date
1999
Address
Diversity Toolkit: A Guide to Discussing Identity, Power and Privilege (WEBPAGE)

This toolkit defines social justice and describes the importance of communal agreements prior to a series of activities that address identity, power and privilege.

Publication Date
2017
Address
Equity in Education—Addressing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education, Volume 1 (PDF)

This technical assistance manual is used for identifying root causes to assist educators seeking to understand disproportionality as an outcome of policies, practices, and beliefs.

Citation/Source

Fergus, E., Ahram, R. Equity in Education—Addressing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education, Volume 1.  Metropolitan Center for Urban Education, NYU Steinhardt, 2009.

Publication Date
2009
Address
Methods for Assessing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education: A Technical Assistance Guide, Revised (PDF)

The resource is a technical guide for understanding how disproportionality is calculated and what the benefits and drawbacks of each method are. It is useful to practitioners that seek to understand the mathematics and logic behind a numerical citation for disproportionality.

Citation/Source

Methods for Assessing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education: A Technical Assistance Guide. (Westat). 2014.

Publication Date
2014
Address
Using Equity Data from Classrooms to Support Teacher Learning for Racial Equity


Teachers—especially White teachers—rarely have opportunities to learn how to teach for racial equity. This study explored a teacher professional development model organized around EQUIP (https://www.equip.ninja/), a research-based classroom observation tool that generates quantitative data on equity patterns in students’ classroom participation. 

Citation/Source

Shah, N. Ph.D., Reinholz, D., and Harris, A. (2023) Using Equity Data from Classrooms to Support Teacher Learning for Racial Equity. California MTSS Research Consortium, UCLA Center for the Tran

Publication Date
2023

Contact SPP-TAP

SPP-TAP logo

CDE Information

CDE logo

Equity in IDEA

Ideas that Work

Funding Information

California Department of Education, Special Education Division's special project, State Performance Plan Technical Assistance Project (SPP-TAP) is funded through a contract with the Napa County Office of Education. SPP-TAP is funded from federal funds, (State Grants #H027A080116) provided from the U.S. Department of Education Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.