• Home
  • significant disproportionality
Address
Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc. v. Elizabeth (Betsy) DeVos, Secretary of Education; Johnny W. Collet, Assistant Secretary for Rehabilitative Services; U.S. Department of Education (PDF)

After a full year of "Delay Regulation" the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the implementation of 2018 federal significant disproportionality regulations.

Citation/Source

United States District Court for the District of Columbia. 2019. Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc. v. Elizabeth (Betsy) DeVos, Secretary of Education; Johnny W. Collet, Assistant Secretary for Rehabilitative Services; U.S. Department of Education. Civil Action No. 18-cv-1636 (TSC). https://youthlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/031-Memorandum-Opinion-re-Defendants-Motion-to-Dismiss-14-Plaintiffs-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-16-and-Defendants-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-22-1.pdf.

Publication Date
2019
Address
Equity Requirements in IDEA (Webpage)


This document contains a table that outlines three distinct requirements around equity: Disproportionate Representation, Significant Discrepancy, and Significant Disproportionality. This resource can help clarify the differences and similarities among the three equity requirements and enable users to compare and contrast these various equity requirements in key areas such as methodology, data sources, and reporting considerations. 

Citation/Source

Nancy O’Hara, and Bollmer, Julie. 2020. Equity Requirements in IDEA. https://www.ideadata.org/resources/resource/1590/equity-requirements-in-idea (accessed September 16, 2022).

Publication Date
2022
Address
School Board Policy - Disproportionality Policy/BP0411 (DOCUMENT)

This Board policy ensures equal access to educational opportunity for all students by minimizing or elimination the impacts of disparities in ability, levels of preparation, available resources and social-cultural differences in achievement and performance. Also, it describes how to prevent disproportionality associated between a child's race or ethnicity and the number and type of special education classifications and placements that result. 

Citation/Source

Mount Diablo Unified School District. 2011. School Board policy - Disproportionality Policy/BP0411. Concord, California: Mount Diablo Unified School District (DOCUMENT)

Publication Date
2011
Address
The IDEA Data Center brought states and districts together in November 2021 to discuss strategies, processes, and infrastructures related to significant disproportionality. The Summit included a keynote session followed by six plenary sessions focused on topics such as cultivating robust stakeholder teams, conducting root cause analysis, addressing different types of disproportionality, and evaluating improvement strategies. Recordings and resources of the sessions are accessible from this website.
Publication Date
November 2021
Address
The Disproportionality of Latinx Students in Special Education: The Growing Need to Build Relationships (ARTICLE)

This article discusses the overrepresentation of Latinx students in special education. It discusses the root causes of significant disproportionality for Latinx students, pre-referral process and data collection, deficit oriented perspectives and building relationships with student and families.

Citation/Source

Lueimo, P., Bindreiff, D. 2021. The disproportionality of Latinx students in Special Education: The growing need to build relationships. Leadership Magazine. Sacramento, California: Association of California School Administrators (ACSA) https://leadership.acsa.org/jan-feb-2021

Publication Date
2021

Contact SPP-TAP

SPP-TAP logo

CDE Information

CDE logo

Equity in IDEA

Ideas that Work

Funding Information

California Department of Education, Special Education Division's special project, State Performance Plan Technical Assistance Project (SPP-TAP) is funded through a contract with the Napa County Office of Education. SPP-TAP is funded from federal funds, (State Grants #H027A080116) provided from the U.S. Department of Education Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.