Address
The Special EDge (PDF)

Newsletter addressing legal, policy, and human aspects of disproportionate representation.

Citation/Source

California Department of Education (2010).

Publication Date
2010
Address
Addressing Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students: Overrepresentation in Special Education: Guidelines for Parents (ARTICLE)

Addresses the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education and outlines the theoretical assumptions and principles that should guide efforts to reduce the disproportionate representation of these students in special education.

Citation/Source

Janette K. Klingner et al. (2005) Education Policy Analysis Archives.

Publication Date
2005
Address
Back to the Future: A Critique of Response to Intervention’s Social Justice Views (ARTICLE)

The article critically engages with the assumptions embedded in RtI. It argues that while the policy may appear to be a comprehensive intervention system it does not directly engage with structural and contextual inequities in school districts. It is an important article for practitioners because it provides a critical lens to understand how policy alone cannot assure equitable outcomes.

 

Citation/Source

Artiles, A. J., Bal, A., and King-Thorius, K. “Back to the Future: A Critique of Response to Intervention’s Social Justice Views.” Theory Into Practice, 49, 2010: 250–257.

Publication Date
2010
Address
Beyond Suspensions: Examining School Discipline Policies and Connections to the Scghool-to-Prison Pipeline for Students of Color with Disabilities (PDF)

This report examines compliance with federal laws designed to protect students of color with disabilities from discrimination, and whether the federal government’s enforcement of these laws adequately protects these students from discriminatory disciplinary actions and policies.

Citation/Source

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 2019. Beyond Suspensions: Examining School Discipline Policies and Connections to the School-to-Prison Pipeline for Students of Color with Disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.

Publication Date
2019
Address
Beyond Suspensions: Examining School Discipline Policies and Connections to the School-to-Prison Pipeline for Students of Color with Disabilities (PDF)

This report examines compliance with federal laws designed to protect students of color with disabilities from discrimination, and whether the federal government’s enforcement of these laws adequately protects these students from discriminatory disciplinary actions and policies.

Citation/Source

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 2019. Beyond Suspensions: Examining School Discipline Policies and Connections to the School-to-Prison Pipeline for Students of Color with Disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.

Publication Date
2019
Address
CCBD’s Position Summary on Federal Policy on Disproportionality in Special Education (PDF)

The paper by the Council for Children with Behavior Disorders critically questions the effectiveness of federal policy and disproportionality monitoring mechanisms. It is an important piece to read because it questions how the provisions in IDEA, and compliance to IDEA, can address disproportionate outcomes. It offers practitioners the chance to reflect on how they understand IDEAs relationship to abatement of disproportionate outcomes.

 

Citation/Source

Skiba, R., S. Albrecht, and D. Losen. 2012. CCBD’s Position Summary on Federal Policy on Disproportionality in Special Education. Arlington, VA: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.

Publication Date
2012
Address
Distinguishing Difference from Disability: The Common Causes of Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education (PDF)

Highlights some of the common policies, practices, and beliefs that place racial/ethnic minorities and low-income students at risk.

Citation/Source

Edward Fergus (2010) NYU Steinhardt Technical Assistance Center on Disproportionality.

Publication Date
2010


This joint report from National Education Policy Center (NEPC) and the Beyond Test Scores Project outlines a more effective and equitable approach to assessment of student learning and accountability for schools and districts. It sets forth a policy agenda for the next reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). At the same time it suggests how local and state leaders might leverage some of the underutilized flexibility available under Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).

Publication Date
2023
Address
Equity in Education—Addressing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education, Volume 1 (PDF)

This technical assistance manual is used for identifying root causes to assist educators seeking to understand disproportionality as an outcome of policies, practices, and beliefs.

Citation/Source

Fergus, E., Ahram, R. Equity in Education—Addressing Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education, Volume 1.  Metropolitan Center for Urban Education, NYU Steinhardt, 2009.

Publication Date
2009
Address
Equity in Special Education Placement: A School Self-Assessment Guide for Culturally Responsive Practice (PDF)


Form A: Administrators; Form B: Assessment Only. A self-study tool that assists district teams in examining policies, procedures, and practices in general and special education to prevent disproportionality. It is ideal for school-level self-assessments and well suited for small districts.

Citation/Source

Heraldo Richards, Alfredo Artiles, Janette Klingner, and Ayanna Brown (2005) National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems.

Publication Date
2005

Contact SPP-TAP

SPP-TAP logo

CDE Information

CDE logo

Equity in IDEA

Ideas that Work

Funding Information

California Department of Education, Special Education Division's special project, State Performance Plan Technical Assistance Project (SPP-TAP) is funded through a contract with the Napa County Office of Education. SPP-TAP is funded from federal funds, (State Grants #H027A080116) provided from the U.S. Department of Education Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.